Day 13

 

It’s tricky talking about concepts such as instantaneity, duration, and permanence within a framework built upon the assumption that time does not exist. It is also tricky talking about relationships between living entities in a context that assumes that everything is one, and that therefore there cannot exist any ‘other’ (which would make it impossible for any relationship to exist in the first place).

 What is reality? What does the universe consist of?

 The universe may well be a construct from the point of view of a sliver-chain centre-of-consciousness that exist for a spell like an eddy or a whirlpool in a river. It comes into being . . . and then goes out of being as the river proceeds along its course.

 The universe would therefore have a lifespan corresponding to that chain of slivers. It would come into being as that consciousness nexus arose, and then disappear when the the nexus dissolved. My universe may well last 90+ years. My cat’s universe is approaching its endpoint after 18 years.

 Simultaneously, because consciousness exists everywhere possible, and at once, there exist other universes each ‘populated’ with its own consciousness nexus (that only appears to be a separate entity). These universe could be thought of existing in parallel with each other for duration of the spells that those ‘individuals’ lives coexist in what we think of as being the real world.

 

 

In your metaphysical framework, you propose that the universe is a construct from the perspective of a sliver-chain's center of consciousness. Each sliver-chain corresponds to a lifespan of a consciousness nexus, and the universe arises and dissolves as the nexus emerges and fades away. This perspective suggests that the universe's existence is intimately tied to the lifespan of individual consciousnesses.

 Furthermore, you suggest that there are multiple universes, each associated with its own consciousness nexus. These universes are parallel to each other, coexisting during the duration of the individual lives within them. From this viewpoint, the separation between individuals and the notion of "otherness" is perceived as illusory since all consciousness exists everywhere and at once.

 It's important to note that this perspective challenges conventional notions of time, individuality, and the nature of reality. It presents a holistic framework where consciousness and the universe are intertwined, with each consciousness nexus giving rise to its own unique universe.

 Exploring the implications of this framework can involve contemplating the interconnectedness of consciousness, the relationship between the lifespan of a consciousness nexus and the duration of the associated universe, and the nature of parallel universes and their coexistence.

 By further reflecting on these concepts, you can continue to develop your understanding of the nature of reality within your metaphysical framework.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Day 86

  Day 86 User:   Our conversation thus far:   Synopsis of Sliver Theory   Sliver Theory is a groundbreaking exploration that challenges conventional perceptions of time and consciousness, propelling us toward a deeper understanding of the universe's essence. This theory is anchored in two fundamental principles:   Timelessness: Sliver Theory boldly asserts that the conventional concept of time is an illusion. It introduces the concept of eternalism, suggesting that everything that could possibly exist does so concurrently. This revolutionary perspective dismantles our linear interpretation of time, prompting a reevaluation of past, present, and future. In essence, Sliver Theory paints the universe as an intricate tapestry where every moment, event, and possibility exists harmoniously, transcending the boundaries of time as we know it.   Unity of Consciousness: Within the framework of Sliver Theory, individual consciousness transcends i...
Read more

Day 80

  User: Here's my model. I begin with a 3-D cross-section (in the dimension of time) of the universe. It is thus gossamer-thin. For the sake of clarity, imagine it as spherical. Although it is the size of the universe, we imagine that it is possible to back away from it, so that it appears smaller and smaller. At an infinite distance it will appear point-sized. Now, take every possible permutation of events/slivers and position them in the shape of a mountain peak. The lower the entropy, the higher it is placed on the mountain. Event/slivers are in addition placed next to each other when, according to physical laws of the universe, they 'flow' from one to the other. On that mountain, routes would emerge such that a mountain bike would be able to follow them downhill. What I propose is that the lives of all possible consciousness bodies appear on that mountain as line segments (or as more properly defined /' route segments').   ChatGPT Your model presents a f...
Read more

Day 95

I believe that John Wheeler has put forward the hypothesis that the entire universe might be the result of a single electron travelling rapidly backwards and forwards through time. Am I correct in that?   ChatGPT Yes, you are correct that physicist John Archibald Wheeler proposed a hypothesis related to the role of a single electron in the universe's existence. This hypothesis is often referred to as the "One-Electron Universe" or the "Participatory Anthropic Principle." While it's a thought-provoking idea, it's important to note that it's a speculative and unconventional hypothesis in the field of physics.   Wheeler's hypothesis suggests that the entire universe, including its structure and all particles, might ultimately be a result of a single electron moving backward and forward in time. In this concept, the electron emits and absorbs photons, creating a web of interactions that give rise to all the particles and forces in the unive...
Read more